Has Ukraine scored an own-goal with its transit fee proposal?

The issue of gas transit through Ukraine remains a crucial commercial and political concern, given the current debate over the future of Nord Stream 2 and the gradual approach of 2019, when the current contract between Gazprom and Naftogaz will expire. In this short note we examine Naftogaz’s latest tactic, which has been to increase the Ukraine transit tariff in the short-term while promising a more competitive fee once its pipeline system has been amortised. We question whether this is the best way for Ukraine to promote the use of its pipeline infrastructure over the long-term, especially given the increasingly competitive nature of the European gas market. We note that Gazprom has adjusted its own marketing strategy to take account of the changing market environment, and we ask whether it might not be logical for Naftogaz to adopt a more commercial, and less political, stance in its transit negotiations if it really wants to reduce the chance of Nord Stream 2 being built.

By: Thierry Bros

Related Publications

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • Jonathan Stern quoted on the future of gas: On CO2 grounds and also methane leakage it will not be possible to repr… https://t.co/wtJ0a7QtK3

    May 18th

  • Jonathan Stern on EU gas market liberalisation: Huge amount achieved in NWE and to lesser extent in Central Europe;… https://t.co/UmieaGKDcA

    May 17th

  • Kallanish Energy reviews an OIES comment on Iran sanctions, Venezuela, the OPEC+ deal, spare capacity, Saudi Arabia… https://t.co/zM6YbcktCw

    May 17th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.