Has Ukraine scored an own-goal with its transit fee proposal?

The issue of gas transit through Ukraine remains a crucial commercial and political concern, given the current debate over the future of Nord Stream 2 and the gradual approach of 2019, when the current contract between Gazprom and Naftogaz will expire. In this short note we examine Naftogaz’s latest tactic, which has been to increase the Ukraine transit tariff in the short-term while promising a more competitive fee once its pipeline system has been amortised. We question whether this is the best way for Ukraine to promote the use of its pipeline infrastructure over the long-term, especially given the increasingly competitive nature of the European gas market. We note that Gazprom has adjusted its own marketing strategy to take account of the changing market environment, and we ask whether it might not be logical for Naftogaz to adopt a more commercial, and less political, stance in its transit negotiations if it really wants to reduce the chance of Nord Stream 2 being built.

By: Thierry Bros

Related Publications

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • J Stern: Gas industry needs new arguments and a credible plan for its European future https://t.co/1CFidWZOF0

    January 20th

  • OIES study quoted on Ukraine Gas Transit:Increasing tariffs boosted development of pipelines threatening its economy https://t.co/2LbjHR9VK9

    January 20th

  • Bassam Fattouh presents 'The Phases of Saudi Oil Policy' to Department of Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy - https://t.co/b3YSKuHFqQ

    January 17th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.