The Reformed Financial Mechanism of the UNFCCC: Renegotiating the role of civil society in the governance of climate change.

To what extent have existing institutions for climate change finance succeeded in bringing the voices of poor and disadvantaged sections of civil society to the decision-making table? This paper by Anju Sharma analyses the models for civil society engagement adopted by the Global Environment Facility and the World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds. It finds that both do little more than provide an occasional venue for a poorly defined entity called ‘global civil society’ to voice concerns, where interactions are limited to one-off events rather than a continuous and integrated process of mutually beneficial engagement. The paper calls on civil society to use the strengths and legitimacy they bring to the process to renegotiate the terms of their engagement, calling particularly for a more ‘bottom-up’ process for bringing local voices to the fore; resources for sustaining and improving the quality of civil society engagement; and formalised processes of mutual accountability.

By: Anju Sharma

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • OIES publishes its new gas quarterly review: With the smallest spread between Gazprom realised price and NBP since… https://t.co/aJMozV6lUe

    June 24th

  • Quarterly Gas Review – Analysis of Prices and Recent Events – Issue 2 https://t.co/075fO46XGN

    June 20th

  • OIES's @thierry_bros quoted in French @RFI on Australia LNG issues: higher domestic gas prices, much lower taxes th… https://t.co/2Dh5GtUZP5

    June 19th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.