The Reformed Financial Mechanism of the UNFCCC: Renegotiating the role of civil society in the governance of climate change.

To what extent have existing institutions for climate change finance succeeded in bringing the voices of poor and disadvantaged sections of civil society to the decision-making table? This paper by Anju Sharma analyses the models for civil society engagement adopted by the Global Environment Facility and the World Bank’s Climate Investment Funds. It finds that both do little more than provide an occasional venue for a poorly defined entity called ‘global civil society’ to voice concerns, where interactions are limited to one-off events rather than a continuous and integrated process of mutually beneficial engagement. The paper calls on civil society to use the strengths and legitimacy they bring to the process to renegotiate the terms of their engagement, calling particularly for a more ‘bottom-up’ process for bringing local voices to the fore; resources for sustaining and improving the quality of civil society engagement; and formalised processes of mutual accountability.

By: Anju Sharma

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • OIES's @thierry_bros interviewed by @Dukascopy_TV on a new narrative for gas in Europe. Europe is in a position to… https://t.co/L0eNUnQ6uP

    November 20th

  • Oxford Energy Podcast – Decarbonized Market Design: An Insurance Overlay on Energy Only Electricity Markets https://t.co/6CKiQNN4bR

    November 20th

  • New OIES study on Russia’s gas pivot to Asia: Barring a dramatic change in the terms of trade, it would now seem th… https://t.co/obkFQPlFy8

    November 20th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.