After the Gazprom-Naftogaz arbitration: commerce still entangled in politics

The final decision in the commercial arbitration between Gazprom and Naftogaz Ukrainy, on multiple disputes over their gas supply and transit contracts for 2009-19, was issued late last month. The total claims in the case, which started in 2014 at the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, were reported to be higher than $70 billion, making it one of the largest cases ever. Gazprom responded by appealing the decisions, initiating proceedings to terminate the contracts and cancelling the planned resumption of direct imports to Ukraine. This Energy Insight argues that hopes for a managed decline of the Russian-Ukrainian gas trade on a commercial basis, despite the political hostility between the two sides, are not being realised. Commerce has been unable to disentangle itself from politics. Prospects for the 2020s, when Ukrainian transit will still be required, in spite of Gazprom’s transit diversification projects, are discussed.

By: Simon Pirani

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • OIES's @thierry_bros shares his views with @ICIS_energy "... investors need low cost LNG to guarantee profitability… https://t.co/eFnRD0ovAa

    November 14th

  • Russia’s gas pivot to Asia https://t.co/FIQFDGJnGR

    November 14th

  • As Denmark is considering its decision in respect of #NordStream2 permit, @katyafimava made a presentation about th… https://t.co/9ePnZ2SzST

    November 13th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.