Europe’s energy security – caught between short-term needs and long-term goals

The EU faces a crisis over Ukraine, as the main protagonist in the unfolding drama, Russia, is also the EU’s largest source of oil, gas, coal and nuclear fuel imports. It is a serious crisis because it appears to mark the start of Europe and Russia turning away from each other, and not just in political terms. Russia is forging new energy links with China, while EU leaders repeated at their June 2014 summit their call for ‘increased efforts to reduce Europe’s high energy dependency’, meaning in particular its reliance on Russia. Energy security measures in the EU face a special constraint in the degree to which they conflict with the long-term goals of energy decarbonisation and affordability that the EU has set itself for 2020, and is now debating for 2030. If the decarbonisation goal is to be met, the EU cannot decide to rely more on its own resources of high-carbon coal, or to rely less on imports of relatively clean gas. This comment argues that the EU can, and should, address the issues of energy security raised by the Ukraine crisis without jeopardising its goals of decarbonisation and affordability. In short, it should not be panicked into letting energy security worries bend its existing policy framework out of shape.

Executive Summary

By: David Buchan

Latest Tweets from @OxfordEnergy

  • Decarbonized Market Design: An Insurance Overlay on Energy-Only Electricity Markets

    October 16th

  • Jim Henderson quoted on Gazprom and Turkmenistan natural gas imports: Extra gas in winter might help Gazprom, and c…

    October 12th

  • At SPIGF OIES’s @thierry_bros interviewed in French on the merits of LNG flexibility in @sputnikInt -

    October 10th

Sign up for our Newsletter

Register your email address here and we will send you notification of new publications, comment, articles etc. automatically.